October 10, 2010

Former Controlled Demolition, Inc., explosives loader and photographer, Tom S...

October 10, 2010

Former Controlled Demolition, Inc., explosives loader and photographer, Tom Sullivan, explained the process of bringing a building down with copper clad cutter charges, whose casings are self-consuming and hence leave no evidence. He said that there was no doubt in his mind, from day one, that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.

I must say I was impressed with the fact that we attracted a member of Control Demolitions Inc. Tom is the real deal — with CDI W2's (proof of his employment by CDI) and FDNY certificate, and all. While that alone was impressive, the wider implications to having such a speaker present may prompt others to come forward.

Erik Lawyer, Lawyer brought a new perspective on 9/11 by quoting from the National Fire Protection Association's Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations — and pointing out glaring omissions of procedure and lack of investigation — such as that specified under the "explosive residue and exotic accelerants testing, including Thermite."

Erik Lawyer picked up the pace on WTC 7, comparing it to nearby buildings, WTC 3, WTC 4 and WTC 6 which were so heavily damaged that no firefighter would consider entering. In contrast, Lawyer said, "WTC 7 had pocket fires and no sign of major destruction that would keep Firefighters from fighting it."

Lawyer, later answering a question concerning destruction of evidence, cited Bill Manning, Editor of Fire Engineering Magazine, from his editorial Selling Out the Investigation: "Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the 'official investigation' blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce [emphasis added] that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure." "If the FDNY start speaking out about this" continued Lawyer, "this thing is going to explode!"

Fire Engineering Magazine article here:

Lawyer structured his presentation as a series of commonly held myths about the WTC buildings on 9/11. The very irrationality of these myths made them quite easily disproved, even to a common layperson. To assist in this, he called on several experts. The first of these was Structural Engineer Kamal Obeid.

Structural engineer Kamal Obeid took apart NIST's so-called "elegant model" for the destruction of WTC 7 point by point, calling the theory, which took seven years to produce, embarrassing. He considers Building 7 a classic case of controlled demolition "no matter how you look at it — it's too obvious."

Full article on the May 7/8, 2010, events here:

Video edits created from the following links, (thank you):

US Govt. Destroyed Crime Scene Evidence - Criminal Cover-Up

North Tower Exploding

Free Fall Acceleration of Building Seven

North Tower Downward Acceleration

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like

South Tower Smoking Guns

NanoThermite in WTC Dust

Molten Concrete & Metal in WTC Debris

WTC Molten Concrete on Display in New York Police Museum


Audio of Explosion Just Before WTC7 Fell


No comments:

Post a Comment


News and Commentary