0
[postlink]http://werehit.blogspot.com/2011/04/planned-parenthoods-lies-and-epas.html[/postlink]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRJd5K4TBtMendofvid
[starttext]
WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

  http://werehit.blogspot.com/

http://werhit-mathenyahu.blogspot.com/

April 5, 2011
Mark Matheny



Go to grassrootsaction.com and demand that CNN news tell the truth about PlanParenthood's Lies:

http://www.grassrootsaction.com/471/email_form.asp?PID=30456300&NID=1





Go to JBS.org and Help End EPA Regulatory Tyranny:



Help End EPA Regulatory Tyranny



Please act on this email alert immediately. Debate on H.R. 910 begins in the House at noon on April 5.



The EPA conveniently claims that the 1970 Clean Air Act has given the agency carte blanche in regulatory powers over all manufacturing companies and heavy industry, energy producers and commuters concerning greenhouse gases. However, The Clean Air Conference rejected adding greenhouse gases to the Clean Air Act twenty years ago. But, that seemingly strong rejection was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2007 decision which allowed the EPA to list carbon as a pollutant.



The self-anointed and unelected regulators of the EPA would implement global warming policies that severely impact business growth and jobs especially in the areas of energy production, in turn affecting energy costs and the entire economy, by regulating carbon emissions. Every hospital, manufacturing facility, power plant, agricultural establishment, refinery, you name it, would be subjected to an endless stream of costly regulations dreamed up by EPA regulators.



The Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, H.R. 910, was introduced by Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and has 95 cosponsors. H.R. 910 would counter the EPA's unconstitutional power trip. The measure would prohibit the EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, plain and simple. It is quite elementary that excessive regulation always increases prices; H.R. 910 is an attempt to protect consumers and industry from high energy prices, and also returns regulation of fuel economy to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.



Global warmists and rabid environmentalists are labeling H.R. 910 a "rebuke" to all the scientists at the EPA and around the world who believe anthropogenic global warming to be an unequivocal truth based on consensus. Of course, other scientists in the tens of thousands disagree. The "national security" mantra has already been trotted out by environmentalists as they also claim the EPA has only the nation's health, welfare and reducing dependence on foreign oil at heart. Climate changers are trying to further discredit the bill by asserting Republicans are just carrying out the agenda of fossil fuel interests; they believe Congress has no business micro-managing regulatory issues "best left to scientific experts." Such an attitude disregards the proper role of Congress in our Constitutional system.



The bill was marked up on March 15, and approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee to be voted on before Easter. Debate in the House begins at noon tomorrow, April 5.



Manufacturing associations and organizations, and energy producers -- oil and gas to nuclear and coal -- all oppose any EPA regulation of greenhouse gases because they know and understand the impact on their products and services, and employees. The surprise has come with labor unions now entering the debate, normally huge supporters of all Democrat policies. Unions composed of utility workers, boilermakers, and mine workers are adamantly opposed to the EPA's regulatory expansion because they contend hundreds of thousands of workers' jobs may be on the line due to just a few of the new rules set forth. Even the steelworkers union is treading with caution and says the EPA needs to be "more mindful of the costs" of such regulations.



If you are in favor of reining in the unconstitutional overreach of the EPA concerning carbon emissions, contact your senators and representatives and have them support H.R. 910 and S. 482, the companion bill in the Senate sponsored by Sen. James Inofe (R-Okla.). As of April 4, H.R. 910 has 95 cosponsors and S. 482 has 43 cosponsors.



Thanks,
Your friends at The John Birch Society



 [endtext]

Planned Parenthood's Lies! and the EPA's Regulatory Tyranny! WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

0
[postlink]http://werehit.blogspot.com/2011/04/michael-c-ruppert-world-in-trouble.html[/postlink]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7cbv7TdjAsendofvid
[starttext]
WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

March 15, 2011
Mike talks to the average citizen about where we stand in the energy crisis.




 [endtext]

Michael C. Ruppert-- A World in Trouble

0
[postlink]http://werehit.blogspot.com/2011/04/regular-fox-contributor-charles-payne.html[/postlink]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbd8WgfjAosendofvid
[starttext]
WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

Fox News

April 3, 2011

One person talks some sense amongst the idiocy passing for analysis on Fox News.



  [endtext]

Regular FOX Contributor Charles Payne “This Is About A One World Government”

0
[postlink]http://werehit.blogspot.com/2011/04/peter-schiff-decline-of-west.html[/postlink]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3RulXehLjkendofvid
[starttext]
WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

PeterSchiffBlog on Mar 11, 2011




For the latest Peter Schiff, go to http://peterschiffblog.com/



Peter Schiff interviews Dambisa Moyo on his radio show. She is the author of several books, including How the West was Lost - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0374173257/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=t... -



Moya notes that most public policies are driven by good intentions. The latest example was the desire to put everyone into their own home. However, this always leads to a malinvestment of resources. Rather than resources being used to build factories, they were used to build houses. They did this for political reasons, and the evidence is clear that this is undermining our economy.



The government wants more resources to go toward things like healthcare, education, and housing. However, this isn't where the market needs more resources. In the 19th century it was true that the United States was borrowing money. The only difference is that the money back then was used for production. Today, all the borrowed money is used for consumption.



Most of this is simply common sense. The policy makers are just trying to trick everyone, and they aren't doing what they should be doing if they really wanted to serve our interests.



Foreign aid is simply taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to the rich people of poor countries. It also undermines their ability to be self sufficient and it makes the recipients of this money dependent on the donors.



It is clear that the political system is flawed. The election cycle implicitly forces the politicians to focus on the short-term. It would be far better to either have one term for everyone or to have far longer terms. When the country was founded, not everyone was allowed to vote. The idea was to limit the election system from turning into an auction on stolen goods. There were stricter age requirements, and there were property requirements.



When China begins to turn away from the United States, they will begin to feel it. They are already doing that. Eventually interest rates will begin to rise because of this.



It is pretty clear that there is a tension between the current generation of the United States and the future generations.



  [endtext]

Peter Schiff - The Decline of the West

0
[postlink]http://werehit.blogspot.com/2011/04/video-our-republic-will-not-be.html[/postlink]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAh8Eoq9QDMendofvid
[starttext]
WE'RE HIT!!! TELEVISION

Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers speakers at Nullify Now! Phoenix on 01-29-11.


topics -- oaths to the constitution, habeas corpus, treason, trial by jury, executive power, war powers, and more…

Thomas Paine: “If there is to be trouble, let it be in my day, so that my child may have peace.”

“Oath Keepers and Tenth Amendment Center are two peas in a pod -- working to restore the republic from the bottom up.”

Learn More at Oathkeepers.com



  [endtext]

Video: Our Republic will not be Destroyed on Our Watch

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!
News and Commentary

SHOP HERE!